Ah right, I just got it now, that you are referring to the maintenance release without RC cycle that was brought up by Tim a while back.
Not sure what would be the proper way to handle this right now, should the PSC vote on that as well? I.e. the type of release? Best regards, Bart On Mar 24, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Bart van den Eijnden wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I was planning on an RC cycle, since that is part of the release procedure. > It does not seem optional there. > > Best regards, > Bart > > On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Eric Lemoine wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Bart van den Eijnden <bart...@osgis.nl> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> with all the "milestone 2.9" tickets now closed, I'd like to start the >>> release procedure (as documented in [*]). >>> >>> Are PSC members ok with that? Please vote. As always everyone is invited to >>> give opinion. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Bart >>> >>> [*] <http://trac.openlayers.org/wiki/Release/Procedure >> >> I can't remember if we've discussed that: will there be a Release >> Candidate cycle? >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> -- >> Eric Lemoine >> >> Camptocamp France SAS >> Savoie Technolac, BP 352 >> 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex >> >> Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96 >> Mail : eric.lemo...@camptocamp.com >> http://www.camptocamp.com >> > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev@openlayers.org > http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
