(Hadn't subscribed to the dev list with new address yet, sorry about that.)
-- Chris Begin forwarded message: > From: "Schmidt Christopher (Nokia-S/Cambridge)" > <christopher.schm...@nokia.com > > > Date: April 13, 2010 3:24:07 PM EDT > To: ext Bart van den Eijnden <bart...@osgis.nl> > Cc: OpenLayers Dev <dev@openlayers.org> > Subject: Re: [OpenLayers-Dev] please vote on OpenLayers 2.9 final > > > On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:17 PM, ext Bart van den Eijnden wrote: > >> Hi list, >> >> since OpenLayers 2.9RC2 has been released one issue has been fixed >> (wrt the KML format), which was clearly a regression from OL 2.8, >> see http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/2398 for the details. >> >> To me it seems this is a trivial fix and it does not need another >> RC, so I am calling for a vote on OpenLayers 2.9 final. May I have >> your votes please? TIA. > > In general, I don't believe in "too small for an RC", but I'm also > willing to defer to the community. I'm -0 on going without another > release, just because I've seen cases where very minor things have > resulted in a broken build in particular use cases. > > However, this vote doesn't block a release, and I defer to others on > the right way to go. > > -- Chris _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
