On Wednesday, April 14, 2010, <christopher.schm...@nokia.com> wrote: > (Hadn't subscribed to the dev list with new address yet, sorry about > that.) > > -- Chris > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: "Schmidt Christopher (Nokia-S/Cambridge)" >> <christopher.schm...@nokia.com >> > >> Date: April 13, 2010 3:24:07 PM EDT >> To: ext Bart van den Eijnden <bart...@osgis.nl> >> Cc: OpenLayers Dev <dev@openlayers.org> >> Subject: Re: [OpenLayers-Dev] please vote on OpenLayers 2.9 final >> >> >> On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:17 PM, ext Bart van den Eijnden wrote: >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> since OpenLayers 2.9RC2 has been released one issue has been fixed >>> (wrt the KML format), which was clearly a regression from OL 2.8, >>> see http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/2398 for the details. >>> >>> To me it seems this is a trivial fix and it does not need another >>> RC, so I am calling for a vote on OpenLayers 2.9 final. May I have >>> your votes please? TIA. >> >> In general, I don't believe in "too small for an RC", but I'm also >> willing to defer to the community. I'm -0 on going without another >> release, just because I've seen cases where very minor things have >> resulted in a broken build in particular use cases. >> >> However, this vote doesn't block a release, and I defer to others on >> the right way to go.
Hi If the people who hit the KML format bug have reported that the fix works for them I'm +1 on not doing RC3 and releasing 2.9. Thanks, -- Eric Lemoine Camptocamp France SAS Savoie Technolac, BP 352 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96 Mail : eric.lemo...@camptocamp.com http://www.camptocamp.com _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
