On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:23 AM, <christopher.schm...@nokia.com> wrote: > You presumably looked at 4.d. and decided that OpenLayers fell under 4.d.1? > With the way we use this library, it's pretty clear to me that we fall under > 4.d.0: > > "0) Convey the Minimal Corresponding Source under the terms of this License, > and the Corresponding Application Code in a form suitable for, and under > terms that permit, the user to recombine or relink the Application with a > modified version of the Linked Version to produce a modified Combined Work, > in the manner specified by section 6 of the GNU GPL for conveying > Corresponding Source." > > (We do not use an 'appropriate shared library mechanism for linking with the > library' -- we build it into our app. If we did require that users linked to > an external site via <script> tag, we might be safer there.)
But you /do/ provide the full source of XMLHttpRequest.js, together with a means of recombining it with your application (you provide the full source, and a build mechanism for openlayers). Anyone could substitute their own modified (or later version) of XMLHttpRequest.js, and create a modified OpenLayers based on that. So what exactly is the issue? Mark _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
