*shrug* If so, it must have been manual, and since it was never added to our release process, I don't know how it was done. (This is a side effect of losing Erik as our 'Write it down!' taskmaster.)
It seems like we have a number of small fixes which might be appropriate for a 2.10, so if so, we should just add this to our release process steps for that release. I don't have a good suggestion on how to do this, other than manual editing. -- Chris On Apr 23, 2010, at 1:56 AM, ext Bart van den Eijnden wrote: > Hey Chris, > > see: > > http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/2589 > > apparently 2.8 did have something in there? > > Check out: > http://openlayers.org/api/2.8/OpenLayers.js > > OpenLayers.VERSION_NUMBER="OpenLayers 2.8 -- $Revision: 9492 $" > > Best regards, > Bart > > On Apr 22, 2010, at 6:10 PM, Bart van den Eijnden wrote: > >> Thanks Chris, the only thing missing is the 2.9 release in the >> VERSION_NUMBER property, how is that done? >> >> Best regards, >> Bart >> >> On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:49 PM, <christopher.schm...@nokia.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:45 AM, ext Bart van den Eijnden wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Chris, >>>> >>>> I've done all the steps up until point 9 in the release procedure [1], are >>>> you able to do steps 10 to 14? I've already created the 2.9 Trac version >>>> and made it the default, I'll pick up at 16 when I hear back from you. >>> >>> Done! >>> >>> -- Chris >> > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
