I had no time to check the signatures and md5 sums yet. But in respect to all the improvments to the testing I think the release will be successful.
Sebastian Am 28.03.2013 03:23 schrieb "Irina Arkhipets" <irina.arkhip...@gmail.com>: > Hi All, > > I hope it's not too late - I've just tried RC3 and tink it's OK. > > +1 from me :) > > Best regards, > Irina. > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Vasya <va...@unipro.ru> wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > I have tested RC3 and not found critical errors. > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Vasiliy. > > > > > > > > > > On 22.03.2013 21:52, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > > >> Dear OpenMeetings Community, > >> > >> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.0 > RC3 > >> > >> RC2 was rejected due to broken audio/video setup panel > >> > >> Main changes are covered in the Readme: > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/**README< > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/README> > >> > >> Full Changelog:http://svn.apache.**org/repos/asf/openmeetings/** > >> tags/2.1RC3/CHANGELOG< > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/CHANGELOG> > >> > >> Release artefacts:https://dist.apache.**org/repos/dist/dev/** > >> openmeetings/2.1/rc3/< > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/> > >> > >> Tag:http://svn.apache.org/**repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.**1RC3/< > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/> > >> > >> PGP release keys (signed using C467526E): > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/**KEYS< > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/KEYS> > >> > >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > >> My vote is +1. > >> > >> > >> > > >
