I think Irina is right. Those are no blockers but would be good to fix as soon as possible.
+1 2013/3/28 Irina Arkhipets <irina.arkhip...@gmail.com> > I've just noticed one more problem in UI, but I would suggest have a > release now without the fix. > > User properties screen contains useless "SIP Account Settings" section > which is actuallu empty. it seems like this is not a regression and > presents in previous version too. > I am going to file a bug about this. > > Again - I don't think this is a blocker for the release. > > Best regards. > Irina. > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Same for me. I have not installed release myself, yet if Denis's > > installation correctly matches a release, I spend a good amount of time > > using it. > > > > Right now the only thing which attracted my eye is inconsistent > microphone > > status indication when entering conference or updating conference > settings. > > This is not a blocker. > > > > -- > > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > > http://dataved.ru/ > > +7 916 562 8095 > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:13 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < > > seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I had no time to check the signatures and md5 sums yet. > > > But in respect to all the improvments to the testing I think the > release > > > will be successful. > > > > > > Sebastian > > > Am 28.03.2013 03:23 schrieb "Irina Arkhipets" < > irina.arkhip...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > I hope it's not too late - I've just tried RC3 and tink it's OK. > > > > > > > > +1 from me :) > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Irina. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Vasya <va...@unipro.ru> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > I have tested RC3 and not found critical errors. > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Vasiliy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 22.03.2013 21:52, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Dear OpenMeetings Community, > > > > >> > > > > >> I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings > > 2.1.0 > > > > RC3 > > > > >> > > > > >> RC2 was rejected due to broken audio/video setup panel > > > > >> > > > > >> Main changes are covered in the Readme: > > > > >> > > > > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/**README > > < > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/README> > > > > >> > > > > >> Full Changelog:http://svn.apache.**org/repos/asf/openmeetings/** > > > > >> tags/2.1RC3/CHANGELOG< > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/CHANGELOG> > > > > >> > > > > >> Release artefacts:https://dist.apache.**org/repos/dist/dev/** > > > > >> openmeetings/2.1/rc3/< > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/> > > > > >> > > > > >> Tag:http://svn.apache.org/**repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.**1RC3/ > < > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1RC3/> > > > > >> > > > > >> PGP release keys (signed using C467526E): > > > > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/**KEYS< > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1/rc3/KEYS> > > > > >> > > > > >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > >> > > > > >> [ ] +1 approve > > > > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > >> > > > > >> My vote is +1. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock http://www.webbase-design.de http://www.wagner-sebastian.com seba.wag...@gmail.com
