I think that is acceptable. I would think we can safely update to Java8 for
the screen sharing app.

Thanks,
Seb

2016-08-30 13:26 GMT+12:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>:

> it's easy to test :)
> open downloaded jnlp file change
> <j2se version='1.7+'/>
> to be
> <j2se version='1.8+'/>
>
> and run it using Java7
>
> you will get:
> 1) warning from javaws: "Your java is too old, please update"
> 2) another warning: "This application would like to use version of Java
> 1.8+"
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:21 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com <
> seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Well another option is obviously compiling screen share with JDK8.
> >
> > As a client you only need JRE8 installed. According to some sources only
> > roughly 50% of users have that:
> > https://plumbr.eu/blog/java/java-version-and-vendor-data-
> > analyzed-2016-edition
> >
> > What is the behaviour in case the Java version is too old? Will the
> screen
> > sharing app show a message saying "Please update Java" or will it just
> > silently fail without any error or generic/cryptic message ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sebastian
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-08-30 13:16 GMT+12:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > We can set "compilance level" to be 1.7, BUT screen-sharing also
> depends
> > on
> > > same mina :(
> > >
> > > OPENMEETINGS-1267 contains server log
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:13 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com <
> > > seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Or is that attached exception in [OPENMEETINGS-1267] actually an
> > > exception
> > > > from the screen sharing applet ? Looks like an exception in the
> server
> > or
> > > > not ?
> > > >
> > > > 2016-08-30 13:12 GMT+12:00 seba.wag...@gmail.com <
> > seba.wag...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >
> > > > > Is it possible so set the build version for the screen sharing
> applet
> > > to
> > > > > Java7 separated from the server ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thx
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-08-30 13:09 GMT+12:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com
> >:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I'm also using java8 for all development (both 3.1 and 3.2)
> > > > >> Why I raise this topic: red5-1.0.8-M9, we are using, depends on
> > apache
> > > > >> mina
> > > > >> built with java8
> > > > >> this is why we have issues like this [1]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]
> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1267?focu
> > > > >> sedCommentId=15445177&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.
> > > > >> system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15445177
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:54 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com <
> > > > >> seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Are you thinking of pushing the value for the source code to
> java
> > > 1.8
> > > > ?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > @Hermant: No, if the Jar has compilation level set to 1.8, a 1.7
> > JVM
> > > > >> can't
> > > > >> > execute it anymore. I am not sure, but I think WebStart has some
> > > > checks
> > > > >> for
> > > > >> > this and might display some error message saying you have to
> > update
> > > > >> Java.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I was building and running v3.2.x with JDK8 all the time. Was
> > doing
> > > > >> fine.
> > > > >> > However not set source code level to 1.8 yet.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I think maybe migrate to JDK8 with the 3.2.x tree and leave
> source
> > > > code
> > > > >> > version to 1.7 for OpenMeetings 3.1.x
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > Sebastian
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > 2016-08-30 9:29 GMT+12:00 Coscend@OM <om.insig...@coscend.com>:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Hello Maxim,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Build JDK 8 is great.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Can the user's browser Java be 1.7 to use screensharing and
> > > > recording?
> > > > >> > > Or, should this be 1.8 as well?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thank you.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Sincerely,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Hemant K. Sabat
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Coscend Communications Solutions
> > > > >> > > Web site: www.Coscend.com
> > > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ------
> > > > >> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: See 'Confidentiality Notice Regarding
> > > E-mail
> > > > >> > > Messages from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at:
> > > > >> > > http://www.Coscend.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > >> > > From: Maxim Solodovnik [mailto:solomax...@gmail.com]
> > > > >> > > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 10:54 AM
> > > > >> > > To: dev <dev@openmeetings.apache.org>
> > > > >> > > Subject: [DISCUSSION] using JDK8 in OM
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Hello All,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > we currently have mix of JDKs in our libraries Maybe it's time
> > to
> > > > set
> > > > >> > JDK8
> > > > >> > > as our build JDK?
> > > > >> > > JDK7 is not being officially updated by Oracle anymore
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > > WBR
> > > > >> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > -----
> > > > >> > > No virus found in this message.
> > > > >> > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > > > >> > > Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4649/12902 - Release
> > Date:
> > > > >> > 08/29/16
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --
> > > > >> > Sebastian Wagner
> > > > >> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > > > >> > seba.wag...@gmail.com
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> WBR
> > > > >> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sebastian Wagner
> > > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sebastian Wagner
> > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > > > seba.wag...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > seba.wag...@gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>



-- 
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
seba.wag...@gmail.com

Reply via email to