Dear Jörn,
As a first milestone, for now we have the main interface with two
implementations (one unsupervised, one supervised), maybe we can add an
evaluator for performance tests and comparison with the test data we currently
have (SemEval, SensEval test sets).
Best,
Anthony
> Subject: Re: GSoC 2015 - WSD Module
> From: kottm...@gmail.com
> To: dev@opennlp.apache.org
> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:47:22 +0200
>
> On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 22:13 +0900, Anthony Beylerian wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I attached an initial patch to OPENNLP-758.
> > However, we are currently modifying things a bit since many approaches need
> > to be supported, but would like your recommendations.
> > Here are some notes :
> >
> > 1 - We used extJWNL
> > 2- [WSDisambiguator] is the main interface
> > 3- [Loader] loads the resources required
> > 4- Please check [FeaturesExtractor] for the mentioned methods by Rodrigo.
> > 5- [Lesk] has many variants, we already implemented some, but wondering on
> > the preferred way to switch from one to the other:
> > As of now we use one of them as default, but we thought of either making a
> > parameter list to fill or make separate classes for each, or otherwise
> > following your preference.
> > 6- The other classes are for convenience.
> >
> > We will try to patch frequently on the separate issues, following the
> > feedback.
>
>
> Sounds good, I reviewed it and think what we have is quite ok.
>
> Most important now is to fix the smaller issues (see the jira issue) and
> explain to us how it can be run.
>
> The midterm evaluation is coming up next week as well.
>
> How are we standing with the milstone we set?
>
> Jörn
>
