Hello, +1 for using extJWNL instead of JWNL, I use it in some other projects too and it is very nice IMHO.
R On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Aliaksandr Autayeu <aliaksa...@autayeu.com> wrote: > Thinking of impartiality... Anyway, I'm the author of extJWNL in case you > have questions. > > Aliaksandr > > On 6 June 2015 at 11:43, Richard Eckart de Castilho < > richard.eck...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 05.06.2015, at 14:24, Anthony Beylerian <anthonybeyler...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > So just to make sure, we are currently relying on JWNL to access WordNet >> as a resource. >> >> There is a more modern fork of JWNL available called >> http://extjwnl.sourceforge.net . >> It includes provisions of loading WordNet from the classpath, e.g. >> from Maven dependencies. It might be a nice replacement for JWNL and is >> also licensed >> under the BSD license. Pre-packaged WordNet Maven artifacts are also >> available. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- Richard
