Hey Cristian,

Sorry for the late reply, I am currently on summer break but will get back
on it in one-two weeks.

Can't really say when there will be a new release.
This usually involves other components as well and it might take time to
vote.

However, some things to expect for the WSD component:

- Support for the different types of classifiers for the supervised
approaches (right now only ME based).
- Support for augmenting the general domain training with specific domain
information.

Best,

Anthony


On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Cristian Petroaca <
cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Anthony,
>
> Do you know when will the WSD component be available in an OpenNLP release?
>
> Thanks,
> Cristian
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Cristian Petroaca <
> cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, that's what I was looking for.
> > Thanks Aliaksandr.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Aliaksandr Autayeu <
> aliaksa...@autayeu.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Cristian, the reference you gave basically uses synset offsets - 1740 is
> >> entity, 1930 is physical entity, etc. However, in YAGO they seems to
> have
> >> added 100000000 to those offsets.
> >>
> >> Synset offset is the fastest way to get into WordNet dictionary, because
> >> it
> >> is a direct file offset. Offset alone is not enough though, you also
> need
> >> POS - part of speech. Speed probably is the reason most people access
> >> WordNet this way. However, offset is not the best "key", especially for
> >> indexing, because offsets change as WordNet evolves. SenseKeys (e.g.
> >> bank%1:14:00::
> >> and bank%1:21:01::) should be more suitable for indexing.
> >>
> >> If you're looking to connect with YAGO above, you might do something
> along
> >> the lines of
> >> ....getWordBySenseKey(sensekey).getSynset().getOffset and then add
> >> 100000000
> >> to get the YAGO ids.
> >>
> >> Aliaksandr
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9 September 2015 at 09:51, Cristian Petroaca <
> >> cristian.petro...@gmail.com
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > I am looking for the Sense Id of the word. It has this format here :
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://resources.mpi-inf.mpg.de/yago-naga/yago/download/yago/yagoWordnetIds.txt
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Anthony Beylerian <
> >> > anthony.beyler...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks it is still being improved.
> >> > >
> >> > > I am not sure what you mean by type or database ID.
> >> > > Currently the sense source and the sense ID are returned.
> >> > >
> >> > > For example:
> >> > >
> >> > > "I went to the bank to deposit money."
> >> > > target : bank (index : 4)
> >> > > expected output : [WORDNET bank%1:14:00:: 21.6, WORDNET
> bank%1:21:01::
> >> > > 5.8,... etc]
> >> > >
> >> > > Where "bank%1:14:00::" is a SenseKey which you can query WordNet
> with
> >> to
> >> > > give you a sense definition.
> >> > >
> >> > > You can do this using the default dictionary :
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> Dictionary.getDefaultResourceInstance().getWordBySenseKey(sensekey).getSynset().getGloss();
> >> > >
> >> > > Hope this is what you are looking for, otherwise please clarify.
> >> > >
> >> > > Anthony Beylerian
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Cristian Petroaca <
> >> > > cristian.petro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi Anthony,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I had a chance to test the wsd component. That's great work.
> Thanks.
> >> > > > One question, is it possible to return the wordnet type (or
> database
> >> > id)
> >> > > of
> >> > > > the disambiguated word?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Cristian
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Anthony Beylerian <
> >> > > > anthonybeyler...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > To try out the ongoing implementations, after checking out the
> >> > sandbox
> >> > > > > repository please try these steps :
> >> > > > > 1- Create a resource models directory:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > - src
> >> > > > >   - test
> >> > > > >     - resources
> >> > > > >       + models
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 2- Include the following pre-trained models and dictionary in
> that
> >> > > > > directory:
> >> > > > > You can find those here [1] if you like or pre-train your own
> >> models.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > {
> >> > > > > en-token.bin,
> >> > > > > en-pos-maxent.bin,
> >> > > > > en-sent.bin,en-ner-person.bin,en-lemmatizer.dict
> >> > > > > }
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > As to train the IMS approach you need to include training data
> >> like
> >> > > > > senseval3 [2]:
> >> > > > > For now, please add these folders :
> >> > > > > - src
> >> > > > >   - test
> >> > > > >     - resources
> >> > > > >        - supervised
> >> > > > >          + raw
> >> > > > >          + models
> >> > > > >          + dictionary
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > You can find the data files here [2].
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 3- We included two examples [LeskTester.java] and
> [IMSTester.java]
> >> > that
> >> > > > > you can run directly, or make your own tests.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > To run a custom test, minimally you need to have a tokenized
> text
> >> or
> >> > > > > sentence  for example for Lesk:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >           1>> String[] words =
> >> > > Loader.getTokenizer().tokenize(sentence);
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Chose the index of the word to disambiguate in the token array.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >           2>> int wordIndex= 6;
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Then just create a WSDisambiguator object for example for Lesk :
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >          3>> Lesk lesk = new Lesk();
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > And you can call the default disambiguation method
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >          4>> lesk.disambiguate(words,wordIndex);
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > You will get an array of strings with the following format :
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Lesk : [Source SenseKey Score]
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > To read the sense definitions you can use the method :
> >> > > > > [opennlp.tools.disambiguator.Constants.printResults]
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > For using the variations of Lesk, you will need to create and
> >> > > configure a
> >> > > > > parameters object:
> >> > > > >           5>> LeskParameters leskParams = new LeskParameters();
> >> > > > > 6>>
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >> leskParams.setLeskType(LeskParameters.LESK_TYPE.LESK_BASIC_CTXT_WIN_BF);
> >> > > > >       7>> leskParams.setWin_b_size(4);          8>>
> >> > > > > leskParams.setDepth(3);          9>> lesk.setParams(leskParams);
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Typically, IMS should perform better than Lesk, since Lesk is a
> >> > classic
> >> > > > > method but it usually used as a baseline along with the most
> >> frequent
> >> > > > sense
> >> > > > > (MFS).
> >> > > > > However, we will be testing and adding more techniques.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > In any case, please feel free to ask for more details.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Best,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Anthony
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > [1] :
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B67Iu3pf6WucfjdYNGhDc3hkTXd1a3FORnNUYzd3dV9YeWlyMFczeHU0SE1TcWwyU1lhZFU&usp=sharing
> >> > > > > [2] :
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByL0dmKXzHVfSXA3SVZiMnVfOGc/view?usp=sharing
> >> > > > > > Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:54:02 +0200
> >> > > > > > Subject: Re: Word Sense Disambiguator
> >> > > > > > From: kottm...@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > To: dev@opennlp.apache.org
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > It would be nice if you could share instructions on how to run
> >> it.
> >> > > > > > I also would like to give it a try.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Jörn
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Anthony Beylerian <
> >> > > > > > anthonybeyler...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Hello,
> >> > > > > > > Yes for the moment we are only using WordNet for sense
> >> > > > definitions.The
> >> > > > > > > plan is to complete the package by mid to late August, but
> if
> >> you
> >> > > > like
> >> > > > > you
> >> > > > > > > can follow up on the progress from the sandbox.
> >> > > > > > > Best regards,
> >> > > > > > > Anthony
> >> > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:36:57 +0300
> >> > > > > > > > Subject: Word Sense Disambiguator
> >> > > > > > > > From: cristian.petro...@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > > > To: dev@opennlp.apache.org
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > I saw that there are people actively working on a Word
> Sense
> >> > > > > > > Disambiguator.
> >> > > > > > > > DO you guys know when will the module be ready to use?
> Also
> >> I
> >> > > > assume
> >> > > > > that
> >> > > > > > > > wordnet is used to define the disambiguated word meaning?
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > > Cristian
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to