Hi William

I have never heard of Features2Vec.

I think for low-level tasks, pre-linguistic tasks such as text classification 
where we don't want to build models and have a one-fits-all  solution, Word2Vec 
works well. I used it in industrial environment for text classification, some 
information extraction and content generation tasks. So I think it should also 
work for low-level OpenNLP tasks.


Regards

Boris


________________________________
From: William Colen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 4:43:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: DeepLearning4J as a ML for OpenNLP

Thank you, Boris. I am new to DeepLearning, so I have no idea the issues we
would face. I was wondering if we can use Features2Vec instead of Word2Vec,
does it make any sense?
The idea was to use DL in low level NLP tasks where we don't have parse
trees yet.


2016-06-29 6:34 GMT-03:00 Boris Galitsky <[email protected]>:

> Hi guys
>
>   I should mention how we used DeepLearning4J for the OpenNLP.Similarity
> project at
>
> https://github.com/bgalitsky/relevance-based-on-parse-trees
>
>
> The main question is how word2vec models and linguistic information such
> as part trees complement each other. In a word2vec approach any two words
> can be compared. The weakness here is that when learning is based on
> computing a distance between totally unrelated words like 'cat' and 'fly'
> can be meaningless, uninformative and can corrupt a learning model.
>
>
> In OpenNLP.Similarity component similarity is defined  in terms of parse
> trees. When word2vec is applied on top of parse trees and not as a
> bag-of-words, we only compute the distance between the words with the same
> semantic role, so the model becomes more accurate.
>
>
> There's a paper on the way which does the assessment of relevance
> improvent for
>
>
> word2vec (bag-of-words) [traditional] vs word2vec (parse-trees)
>
>
> Regards
>
> Boris
>
> [https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/1051120?v=3&s=400]<
> https://github.com/bgalitsky/relevance-based-on-parse-trees>
>
> bgalitsky/relevance-based-on-parse-trees<
> https://github.com/bgalitsky/relevance-based-on-parse-trees>
> github.com
> Automatically exported from
> code.google.com/p/relevance-based-on-parse-trees
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Anthony Beylerian <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:13:38 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: DeepLearning4J as a ML for OpenNLP
>
> +1 would be willing to help out when possible
>

Reply via email to