Hi,

+1 (binding)

Checks & steps:

0.) Both source (tar.gz/zip) and binary artifacts (tar.gz/zip) are present, 
along with .asc and .sha512 files for each => PASSED
1.) Verified hashes and PGP signatures: => PASSED
2.) Build successfully from apache-opennlp-3.0.0-M6-src.tar.gz on:

Apache Maven 3.9.16 (2bdd9fddda4b155ebf8000e807eb73fd829a51d5)
Maven home: /Applications/apache-maven-3
Java version: 21.0.12, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: 
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/temurin-21.0.12.jdk/Contents/Home
Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "mac os x", version: "26.6.2", arch: "aarch64", family: "mac"

and artifacts were produced as expected. Source release matches tag 
opennlp-3.0.0-M6 (6a513dff…) => PASSED

3.) Checked content of RC1’s binary distribution, that is 
apache-opennlp-3.0.0-M6-bin.tar.gz => PASSED
4.) Checked the shipped docs folder is in good shape and contains the expected 
artifacts (dev manual HTML + PDF, and Javadoc per module) => PASSED
5.) Did some individual tests w/ the release candidate, primarily in library 
use case, that is "opennlp-runtime" instead of "opennlp-tools".  => PASSED

Thanks to all contributors and for getting this out.

mawiesne | Martin

> Am 10.09.2026 um 19:22 schrieb Richard Zowalla <[email protected]>:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Checked:
> - Signatures (key B83D15E7…E5B8A431 from KEYS) and SHA-512 for all
>  src/bin tar.gz/zip: OK
> - Source release matches tag opennlp-3.0.0-M6 (6a513dff…)
> - LICENSE/NOTICE present; no unexpected binaries in src
> - Build from src: mvn clean install apache-rat:check -> BUILD SUCCESS
>  (JDK 25.0.2, Maven 3.9.16, macOS), all tests pass
> - Eval tests #38: SUCCESS
> 
> Non-blocking (same state as in M5), filed for follow-up:
> - OPENNLP-1939: bin LICENSE lacks full libsvm (BSD-3) and SLF4J (MIT)
>  texts; stale CDDL/jersey section
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1939
> - OPENNLP-1940: a few files without ASF headers (module poms, dl READMEs,
>  BENCHMARKS.md, README_FOOTER.html, Dockerfile); RAT configured to never fail
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1940
> - OPENNLP-1941: src release omits leipzig/samples/.hidden test resource
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1941
> 
>> Am 08.09.2026 um 12:09 schrieb Richard Zowalla <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 3.0.0-M6 RC1
>> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> I have posted a first release candidate for the Apache OpenNLP 3.0.0-M6 
>> release and it is ready for testing.
>> 
>> This milestone adds a pure-Java SentencePiece inference API that preserves 
>> exact original-text spans (OPENNLP-1885), a document annotation container 
>> with typed, offset-anchored layers (OPENNLP-1888) together with a 
>> document-scoped term vector layer (OPENNLP-1897), dictionary-based 
>> tokenization for Japanese, Korean and Chinese (OPENNLP-1894), and support 
>> for Hunspell affix dictionaries for stemming (OPENNLP-1893).
>> 
>> A large part of this candidate is about correctness and robustness. 
>> Default-locale case folding no longer corrupts lemmatizer models and output 
>> or breaks Morfologik dictionary lookup (OPENNLP-1904, OPENNLP-1905), the 
>> EMAIL and URL patterns in RegexNameFinderFactory can no longer exhaust the 
>> stack (OPENNLP-1922), SymSpell model deserialization is hardened against 
>> oversized count fields (OPENNLP-1899), cached models are verified against 
>> their SHA-512 checksum (OPENNLP-1902), and there is now a general verified 
>> installer for user-supplied third-party resources (OPENNLP-1909). The 
>> OpenNLP security model is documented and published (OPENNLP-1900).
>> 
>> On the performance side, BeamSearch replaces per-candidate Sequence copies 
>> with chain nodes (OPENNLP-1903), and the sentence detector's abbreviation 
>> veto is no longer quadratic in document length (OPENNLP-1906). There is also 
>> a new Paragraph Normalizer for Gutenberg-style and Markdown text 
>> (OPENNLP-1921), and ONNX Runtime moves to 1.28.0.
>> 
>> Thank you to everyone who contributed to this release, including all of our 
>> users and the people who submitted bug reports, contributed code or 
>> documentation enhancements.
>> 
>> The release was made using the OpenNLP release process, documented on the 
>> website:
>> https://opennlp.apache.org/release.html
>> 
>> Maven Repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1073
>> 
>> <repositories>
>> <repository>
>> <id>opennlp-3.0.0-M6-rc1</id>
>> <name>Testing OpenNLP 3.0.0-M6 release candidate</name>
>> <url>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1073
>> </url>
>> </repository>
>> </repositories>
>> 
>> Binaries & Source:
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/opennlp/opennlp-3.0.0-M6-rc1/
>> 
>> Tag:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/opennlp/releases/tag/opennlp-3.0.0-M6
>> 
>> Tag Hash: 6a513dffb52e67d750fe8eef00e46d258875d461
>> 
>> Release notes:
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311215&version=12357275
>> 
>> The results of the eval tests for the aforementioned tag can be found
>> here: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/OpenNLP/job/eval-tests-releases/38/
>> 
>> Reminder: The up-2-date KEYS file for signature verification can be
>> found here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/opennlp/KEYS
>> 
>> Checklist for reference:
>> 
>> [ ] Both source (tar.gz/zip) and binary artifacts (tar.gz/zip) are present, 
>> along with .asc and .sha512 files for each.
>> [ ] PGP signatures are valid for the release artifacts using the KEYS file 
>> from dist.apache.org
>> [ ] SHA512 checksums are correct and verified.
>> [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files exist and are accurate.
>> [ ] No unexpected binary files in the source release.
>> [ ] All source files have appropriate ASF headers (excluding generated files 
>> and legacy files).
>> [ ] Build completes successfully from source and the instruction to do so 
>> are clear.
>> 
>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OpenNLP 3.0.0-M6. The
>> vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
>> 
>> Only votes from OpenNLP PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to
>> check the release candidate and vote.
>> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>> 
>> Please VOTE
>> 
>> [+1] go ship it
>> [+0] meh, don't care
>> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Richard
> 

Reply via email to