Having it in the wiki would be nice, because then our users can find more information in ONE place.
I am all for anything the puts information in one common URL (e.g. wiki.openoffice.org), having to look for information on multiple sites is not exactly user friendly (hint to Cwiki). rgds jan I. On 15 January 2013 21:22, Juergen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2013 um 20:19 schrieb Rob Weir: > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Rony G. Flatscher > > <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at> wrote: > > > Rob, > > > > > > Am 15.01.2013 um 19:54 schrieb Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > http://codesnippets.services.openoffice.org/index.xml > > > > > > > > I noticed this linked to from another page. It looks a mess. But the > > > > source does not appear to be in SVN, so I don't see any way to clean > > > > it up. > > > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > > The corresponding e-mail of last year (March 11th, 2012), including > the contact information, attached. > > > > OK. Thanks. So it is external and not under our control, though > > obviously we could drop the DNS entry if we feel this is abandoned. > > > > I can see how having code snippets would be useful for developers, > > But can't we do most of this on the MWiki? > > > > > > yes, we can do more or less the same in the wiki. Under > http://wiki.openenoffice.org/wiki/API we had started to collect samples, > tutorials and we can extend it to simple snippets. When we use appropriate > categories we can easy navigate through the snippets etc. > I think we can either drop the external site completely or we can merge > the snippets in the wiki. But in general we should extend the API section > in the wiki. > Currently it looks messed but this is new and probably related to the wiki > update. Some cleanup or correction is necessary. > > Juergen > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > > > HTH > > > > > > ---rony > > > > > > ============================================ > > > Rob, > > > > > > > > > On 11.03.2012 03:26, Rob Weir wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> > wrote: > > > > > Rob, > > > > > > > > > > This site is not hosted by oracle. > > > > > > > > > > It is another third party. > > > > Do you have the details on that, e.g., what 3rd party? We should > > > > probably have a conversation and ensure that suitable disclaimers are > > > > put in place and that we're not giving one 3rd party favorable access > > > > at the exclusion of others. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the pointer with the e-mail address of the hoster. > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > Subject: Re: Just a minor remark: codesnippet pages look a little bit > strange > > > Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:49:39 +0100 > > > From: Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) <r...@apache.org> > > > Reply-To: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org > > > To: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > On 02.01.2012 18:39, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > It is not hosted at Oracle, and has not been migrated. > > > > > > > > The site is powered by Apache AxKit and BestSolutions@ > > > > > > > > Nslookup yields: > > > > > > > > codesnippets.services.openoffice.org canonical name = > ancamna.bestsolution.at. > > > > Name: ancamna.bestsolution.at > > > > Address: 94.198.139.11 > > > > > > > > Another job for the PPMC, Infrastructure, and/or Trademarks - make > contact with bestsolutions @ > > > contact in this case would probably be " > Tom.Schindl-a-t-bestsolution.at", who has been also very > > > active in the Eclipse project AFAIK. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > ---rony > > > > > > HTH, > > > > > > ---rony > >
