Andrew I think that binaries URL should be he following, at least for accessing the binaries.
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/#w7ia2 As you point out however they are not there yet. Do you have an ETA? After Stuart's post of the NVDA list there has been quite a bit of discussion and enthusiasm from some NVDA people on Twitter so others may come looking. https://twitter.com/jcsteh/status/301051115502448641 Steve OpenDirective On 10 February 2013 01:14, Andrew Rist <andrew.r...@oracle.com> wrote: > Do you all know about this? > http://ci.apache.org/builders/**aoo-w7ia2/<http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-w7ia2/> > We now have an automatic build of the ia2 branch running nightly. (and > successfully) > It is not loading up install bits for some reason, but I'll look at that > and fix it. > > If you want to see the status of the latest build look for "Windows ia2 > Branch" on this page: > http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/> > that page links to the build logs <http://ci.apache.org/** > projects/openoffice/buildlogs/**w7ia2/log/wntmsci12.pro.build.**html<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/w7ia2/log/wntmsci12.pro.build.html>> > and the buildbot log > <http://ci.apache.org/**builders/aoo-w7ia2/builds/6<http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-w7ia2/builds/6>>, > and should have the latest build of the install packages. > > Andrew > > > > > On 2/9/2013 10:05 AM, V Stuart Foote wrote: > >> Steve, >> >> Nothing substantive yet in working through the Windows build of the ia2 >> branch. Should we build against Linux and OSX and be testing for impact on >> ATK/AT-SPI and NSAccessibility User Interface? >> >> And, with QA and testing of the ia2 branch proceeding what mechanism >> should folks use for reporting and tracking issues on the ia2 branch builds? >> >> Should we stay with PM and ML exchanges, or start to use Bugzilla at >> issues.apache.org/ooo? I believe that starting with BZ tracking now >> provides continuity upon merge of branch back into AOO4.00. >> >> And, if into Bugzilla, would suggest a note in your AOO 4.0 IAccessible2 >> release planning wiki that QA participants and casual users report in >> Bugzilla categorized for consistency as against: >> >> Product: UI >> Component: AccessBridge >> Version: AOO4.00-dev >> >> Stuart >> >> =-=-= >> >> Sidebar--the legacy IAccessible2 enhancement bug could probably be revised >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=107914<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=107914> >> >> And here is a generic BZ search for accessibility issues >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**buglist.cgi?query_format=** >> advanced&resolution=---&short_**desc=msaa%20accessible%** >> 20iaccessible%20iaccessible2%**20accessibility&short_desc_** >> type=anywordssubstr&order=**component%2Cpriority%2Cbug_** >> severity&query_based_on=<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&resolution=---&short_desc=msaa%20accessible%20iaccessible%20iaccessible2%20accessibility&short_desc_type=anywordssubstr&order=component%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=> >> >> >
