On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Michael Lam <mnsyl4...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 03/30/2013 04:30 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> On 29/03/2013 Reizinger Zoltán wrote: >> >>> 2013.03.29. 17:25 keltezéssel, Michael Lam írta: >>> >>>> I have been working on updating the HSQL to the latest version. I have >>>> most of the configure and build portion ready >>>> >>> >> Thank you, Michael! While in general Base sees less attention from >> developers, I suspect that if you have specific questions then someone >> lurking on this list will come out. A lower-hanging fruit could be, in the >> meantime, to get HSQLDB 1.8.x build correctly with Java 7, see >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=121754<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121754> >> >> All code was stored in cws hsqldb19: >>> http://hg.services.openoffice.**org/hg/cws/hsqldb19/<http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/hsqldb19/> >>> The code transfer to ASF is not clear to me. >>> >> >> If it can be useful to the project we can investigate it. I think that >> legal issues are among the few confidential topics better discussed >> off-list... but if anyone knows more, feel free to contact me directly so >> that we can get it done. >> >> Regards, >> Andrea. >> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> >> I started on the integration of 2.2.9 because the project took care of > the handling different jdk and also the patches being applied were > integrated into the codebase. Overall I saw it as a better move to have > those issues taken care of and gain whatever advances that was made between > 2.2.9 and 1.8.x. > > As fir the cws hsqldb19 branch, i did check through it and the patches > from there are currently being used. Beside that I didn't see any relevant > changes, for example the check for 1.8.x in the configure script. I ran > into that while working on another issue. yes...I asked about this yesterday on one of the issues -- there is a lovely patch! -- not yet submitted. Somewhat under discussion in: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121837 Anyone wanting to deal with any hslqdb 2.2.9 will run into this problem. One thing I am looking into at the moment is recovery in Base, that are > code that is checking for the version of hsql but I have not been able to > locate it. > > Any pointers or knowledge of the Base code would be most helpful since > just poking around is quite time consuming. I am learning quite a bit about > the code so it is not all bad. > > Michael > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Achieving happiness requires the right combination of Zen and Zin."
