Am 04/04/2013 11:27 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>  wrote:

Am 04/01/2013 03:12 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:

  On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
  wrote:

Hi Rob,

I want to cleanup the structure and remove 1 of the 2 directories for
images.

Therefore I've added the images from "download/images" also to "images/"
and
updated the "download/index.html" to point to the new location.

Please tell me, is it save to remove the "download/images/" directory? If
not what else has to be updated?


I'm not sure I like the idea of having a global images directory
rather than having images scoped to the subtree where they are
actually used.  Having a single global directory increases the changes
of having accidental conflicts.  But if you want to make this change,


That's not what I want. Please read again. I just want to get rid of 1 of
the 2 images directories in the "download/" sub-dir.

Of course it doesn't make sense to have a single images dir for the entire
website. ;-)


Actually I don't think a single "images" directory for the whole site is
such a bad idea. We could subdivide it by area -- e.e. images/download.

OK, maybe there are some reasons that prof that it makes sense. And my wording was not appropriate.

However, actually we have some wide-spreaded image directories within the entire website. So, if we would consolidate all images into a single directory someone has to fix all the broken links that would then exist. I've just checked-out a handfull of sub-dirs and I've counted nearly 100 HTML files - and I've no NL websites checked or CSS files.

Maybe worth discussing at some point?

Sure, don't let me hold you back. :-)

Marcus



  be sure to test each of the "Help spread the word" links for
Twitter/Facebook/Google+ to make sure those applications are finding
the right images.  I don't mean the image on our page.  I mean the
image on the post once it is on Facebook, etc.  Since hundreds of such
posts have already been made, we probably don't want to break any of
those links.


You mean Twitter/Facebook/Google+ articles are referring to
".../download/images/*" files? That's bad, then we won't never be able to
move such kind of files in the future.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to