On 4 June 2013 04:13, Alexandro Colorado <j...@oooes.org> wrote: > IMO we should re-wire and update the specific information for builds and > distros. or go the other way and move this info into the original build > guide. > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide< > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO> > > I think it would be best to: 1) have a wiki page, where we list our build setup (pr platform) - which sw is installed - which configure switches are used - any other things needed to setup an identical environment 2) I understand (maybe wrong), that the release build is different, so that should be documented like 1) 3) keep our building guides general (apart from small changes, I find them quite good)
rgds jan I. > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Do we need some further explanation on C++ compiler capabilities in our > > Build Guide > > > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO > > > > given recent discussions on this list? One of the reasons I'm brining > this > > up is in my own experience, weird C issues can really drive you off the > > deep end. > > > > Thanks to anyone willing to edit this section. > > > > -- > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > MzK > > > > "You can't believe one thing and do another. > > What you believe and what you do are the same thing." > > -- Leonard Peltier > > > > > > -- > Alexandro Colorado > Apache OpenOffice Contributor > http://es.openoffice.org >
