On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Donald Whytock <dwhyt...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Kevin Grignon
>> <kevingrignon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I propose we take a final pass to prepare the logo for production.
>> >
>> > The vector artwork should be converted curves, the "ff" elements need to
>> be combined, and some font kerning adjusted.
>> >
>> > Then we should document the logo on the AOO UX wiki.
>> >
>> > Who is preparing all the new graphics?
>> >
>>
>> Whoever volunteers.  But if you have some specific changes in mind it
>> would probably be faster to make them yourself and post a new SVG (or
>> sent it to me) than to describe it in enough detail that I, without
>> expertise in the area, can make the changes myself.
>>
>> In any case, if we are going to make changes to the "master" logo then
>> let's do that first, before creating the bitmaps.
>>
>
> Pardon if I missed this in earlier discussions, but...is the new logo going
> to apply to 4.0 and onward?  Is it okay if 3.4.1 is associated with the old
> logo?
>

3.4.1 includes the previous logo.  That won't change.  If, for
example, we had to issue a 3.4.2 maintenance release I doubt we would
update the logo there.

But when we update the website, the new logo would be on all pages,
including those pages that discuss 3.4.1 and earlier versions.

This should be less confusing, IMHO, then the many places on the
website and wiki where we still call ourselves "OpenOffice.org".

-Rob


> Don

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to