On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Shenfeng Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > We can get the data from SourceForge by define the date range by ourselves: > http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/map > :) >
That page measures something subtly different. It shows what platform the user was running when downloading. The number I reported was what platform version of AOO the user downloaded. The numbers should be close, but it is possible, for example, that a user downloads the Mac version of AOO from a Windows machine at work, and then copies onto a USB key to bring home to install on their Mac. The SF page would count that as a Windows user. My report would count that as a Mac user. -Rob > - Shenfeng (Simon) > > > 2013/6/18 Rob Weir <[email protected]> > >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 17 June 2013 21:45, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:32 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >>> In the first 1 million or so AOO downloads, the breakdown was 87% >> >>> Windows, 11% Macintosh and 2% Linux. >> >>> But, of course, there's been over 50 million. Do we have a >> >>> per-platform breakdown of the numbers since then for AOO? >> > >> >> It sounds like you want this chart: >> >> >> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/690f6d03-d666-4003-b1b2-8e44331e2511 >> >> From this blog post: >> >> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/apache_openoffice_one_year_50 >> > >> > >> > That's the one, thank you! Do you have the % numbers that went into the >> graph? >> > >> >> That chart shows it day-by-day. The %'s vary over time. But the >> average over the year is: >> >> Windows: 88% >> Mac OS: 10% >> Linux: 2% >> >> So little difference compared to the distribution reported initially. >> It still reflects the distribution of desktop OS usage in the market. >> >> -Rob >> >> > >> > - d. >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Opinions expressed in this communication reflect the author's >> individual personal view, not necessarily that of an amorphous >> collective. The above statements do not reflect an official position >> of any organization, corporation, religion (organized or disorganized) >> or national football association. The contents of said note are not >> guaranteed to have been spell checked, grammar checked or reviewed for >> metrical infelicities. The contents of this post may not be suitable >> for those whose native language is not logic. Caution should be >> exercised when operating heavy machinery when reading this note, or >> even when not reading it. Seriously, heavy machinery is dangerous. >> Be careful. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> -- Opinions expressed in this communication reflect the author's individual personal view, not necessarily that of an amorphous collective. The above statements do not reflect an official position of any organization, corporation, religion (organized or disorganized) or national football association. The contents of said note are not guaranteed to have been spell checked, grammar checked or reviewed for metrical infelicities. The contents of this post may not be suitable for those whose native language is not logic. Caution should be exercised when operating heavy machinery when reading this note, or even when not reading it. Seriously, heavy machinery is dangerous. Be careful. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
