> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] 

> > I am not familiar with the market for C++ programming, but 
> to me LO is a general offer from a company that is ready to 
> process orders from a minimum size of approximately 5000 euros.
> > 
> 
> I assume it is Lanedo or Suse which both were involved in the project
> sponsored by the OSBA. Ok these projects were a little bit bigger than
> 5000 Euro but nevertheless a smaller company like Lanedo can be more
> flexible here than bigger companies.
> It's fine and good to see that smaller ISVs or companies see 
> the benefit
> of such an offering. And business rules if they have the knowledge and
> the demand is growing they will probably offer similar things 
> for AOO as
> well. If customers will ask why should they deny. For political or
> license reason? 

This is an interesting point, and so I had already asked for it, and the 
company has refused. Whether for political reasons or because of the AOO code 
too much different than the LO (and then to a need for additional training 
time) I can not say.


Greetings,
Jörg




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to