On Jul 19, 2013, at 9:09 AM, janI wrote: > On 19 July 2013 17:11, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7/19/13 5:07 PM, Donald Whytock wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The vote period to release the RC2 (based on release branch AOO40, >>>> revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 has ended. >>>> >>>> The ballot result in 24 votes, 24 +1 votes including 14 binding PMC >>>> member votes. >>>> >>>> 3 binding +1 votes are necessary for the release. That means the ballot >>>> closed successful to release the RC2 as AOO 4.0 >>>> >>>> Vote tally >>>> >>>> +1 Jan Iversen (binding) >>>> +1 Keith McKenna >>>> +1 Olaf Felka >>>> +1 Sylvain Denis >>>> +1 Marco A.G. Pinto >>>> +1 V Stuart Foote >>>> +1 Samer Mansour >>>> +1 Ricardo Berlasso (binding) >>>> +1 Rory O'Farrell >>>> +1 Rob Weir (binding) >>>> +1 Shengfeng Liu >>>> +1 Kay Schenk (binding) >>>> +1 Marcus Lange (binding) >>>> +1 Regina Henschel (binding) >>>> +1 Andrew Rist (binding) >>>> +1 Donald Harbison (binding) >>>> +1 Xuacu >>>> +1 Juergen Schmidt (binding) >>>> +1 Yuzhen Fan >>>> +1 Andrea Pescetti (binding) >>>> +1 Armin Le Grand (binding) >>>> +1 Herbert Duerr (binding) >>>> +1 Kazunari Hirano (binding) >>>> +1 Andre Fischer (binding) >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Juergen >>>> >>>> >>> Imacat voted -1. Is he non-binding? >>> >> >> the vote was not valid from my perspective because she voted on >> something that was part of the vote. I haven't count it but of course it >> would not change the result. And I believe imacat made it clear in a >> later response. >> > > Hi > > I know it does not change anything, but imacat did not withdraw her -1, so > it should be in the tally for the record. The vote is binding and should be > counted. > > It is in principle no good, that a single person decides if a vote is valid > or not, it sort of invalidates the idea of voting.
imacat's VOTE was not a Veto as you cannot veto a release. Since it was not a VETO situation there is no invalidation. Please count her VOTE as (binding) In a sense this is different from Rapheal's -1 which was agreed by acclamation once the flaw was obvious. Thank you. > > rgds > jan I. > > > >> >> Juergen >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
