On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org>wrote:
> On 25/09/2013 Rob Weir wrote: > >> http://www.pcworld.com/**article/2048446/apache-** >> openoffice-4-0-review-new-**features-easier-to-use-still-**free.html<http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048446/apache-openoffice-4-0-review-new-features-easier-to-use-still-free.html> >> Title is "Apache OpenOffice 4.0 review: New features, easier to use, >> still free" >> > > Nice review, even though one of the initial sentences > --- > Like LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org, Apache OpenOffice "forked" from > Oracle OpenOffice (which grew from StarOffice) in 2010. > --- > it's so dense of errors that makes me wonder where people get information > from (to avoid confusion: the sentence contains several errors, but the > most disturbing one is that it portrays OpenOffice.org as a fork of Oracle > OpenOffice). > Egads! Makes one wonder... > > Regards, > Andrea. > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn't." -- "Following the Equator", Mark Twain