On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org>wrote:

> On 25/09/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> http://www.pcworld.com/**article/2048446/apache-**
>> openoffice-4-0-review-new-**features-easier-to-use-still-**free.html<http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048446/apache-openoffice-4-0-review-new-features-easier-to-use-still-free.html>
>> Title is "Apache OpenOffice 4.0 review: New features, easier to use,
>> still free"
>>
>
> Nice review, even though one of the initial sentences
>   ---
> Like LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org, Apache OpenOffice "forked" from
> Oracle OpenOffice (which grew from StarOffice) in 2010.
>   ---
> it's so dense of errors that makes me wonder where people get information
> from (to avoid confusion: the sentence contains several errors, but the
> most disturbing one is that it portrays OpenOffice.org as a fork of Oracle
> OpenOffice).
>

Egads! Makes one wonder...


>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged
 to stick to possibilities. Truth isn't."
                             -- "Following the Equator", Mark Twain

Reply via email to