Hi,

The OpenDocument format (ODF) which has it's roots in OpenOffice is a
good thing and it helped a lot that office productivity becomes a little
bit more transparent and a step forward to become vendor independent.
Ideally one standard would have been used and would evolve over time to
address new requirements, features etc.

We all know that the reality is different and we have today 2 open
standards for more or less the same thing, at least from my point of view.

We have ODF which is an OASIS and ISO standard (ISO/IEC 26300:2006), see
[1] and [2]. And we have OOXML which is an Ecma and ISO standard
(ISO/IEC 29500-1:2008), see [3] and [4].

We can now argue why do we have 2 standards and can discuss the pros and
cons. But does it help? I don't think so and I believe we have to live
with the current situation.

But this means that we have to take into account that OOXML is an
important file format that becomes more and more important over time.
And that we should think about a strategy to support this format better
in AOO.

We see growing demand for better interoperability with OOXML and I
believe we can't ignore this anymore. We have OOXML import which have to
be improved and we don't have an export yet. I think it was a strategic
decision from Sun/Oracle to focus on an import only. I believe the goal
was to push ODF and an ODF eco system which was not a bad idea. But
again the reality seems to be different today and the demand for OOXML
is growing.

That is the reason why we will start to investigate in a better OOXML
support for AOO and you will probably notice some more activity in the
future going in this direction. We have already started to analyze what
we have and how we can push things forward. One thing is of course the
missing export and the other thing an improved import. For the import we
are thinking about a bigger change to consolidate 3 different approaches
in 3 applications that we have today and we plan to start a new
framework. Something cleaner and better structured as what we have today
and that will give us further opportunities to use it for analyzing of
documents and used features, tracking of our coverage and in the end to
become more efficient.

Of course this does not mean that we support ODF any less. We remain
strong supporters of ODF and aim to be the reference implementation for
the standard. AOO committers like Regina, Oliver and Rob work directly
on the ODF standard in OASIS.
And it is not really about choosing one standard over another. The point
is to preserve the MS interop capabilities that OOo always had, and
update it to work with the latest formats used by MSO.

Anyway this will be a major task but I believe a necessary and important
one for AOO to continue to be the best free open source office suite.


Juergen


[1] https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office

[2]
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43485

[3] http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm

[4] http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=51463

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to