2013/10/28 Vladislav Stevanovic <[email protected]>: >>Why should we mark them? > > If there is some warning mark, visually you will in easier way to > know that this extension is not compatible with AOO4.0. We can even > more. We can (near that mark) add button for link to the version > which can run on AOO4.0. Where we can add this marks, buttons?Before > you actual go inside some of extension's page, you have page where is > some kind list of extensions, what serve as preview. I think that this > page with list of extensions, given by search engine, is not page of > authors of extensions, so I think that we can freely add this helpful > marks, buttons etc. Purpose of this is to save time for end-user when > he/she want to find appropriate extension. But, if somebody miss to > see marks or he/she using direct link to the author's page of > extension, your idea to having pop-ups will solve the potential > problem. With this pop-up dialog we will get good warnings and solver > system for end-users.
You got the gist, right. >>Who's going to do those changes? > > That is next step of this discussion. If we have consensus about this > basic steps (how we want to manage this problem) than next step is to > see who want to take responsibility for that area. Who have skills, > time and good will to make changes on site "Extensions", and who want > to made corrections inside extensions (if licence of extensions permit > that). In other words we can provide a platform doing the magic, but we need people to take care of updating those Extensions. We might want to run in parallel those two processes, though. Roberto > > Regards, > Wlada > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
