Am 02/14/2014 10:31 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify some
things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to prepare
webpages:
1. Target group
It is intended to be downloaded for the general public, right?
yes, I think it needs to go a vote process as we've previously discussed.
I'd need to look up the discussion on this.
2. Hosting
We are planning to host the files at Sourceforge, right?
3. File names:
Of course the file names of the install files have to show a difference
compared to the general release files. Suggestion:
Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta_Win_x86_install.exe
*If* there is a need to publish another round, it could be extended with a
number like:
Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.0_Beta2_Win_x86_install.exe
Good point...
4. Directory structure:
Is it OK to expect to use the same dir structure like we have currently
for 4.0.1?
5. Download webpage:
Is it OK to expect to offer the download on our main download webpage?
http://www.openoffice.org/download/
If yes, I can build up a download offer like we have for the green box. To
ease the download as best as possible.
Maybe it would be better to have a separate "beta" page, or "beta" area on
the download page like the former OOo site had for developer releases?
Indeed I thought about to put it somewhere below the green box. Of
course with different color and text. But a separate webpage is also OK.
Let's see what the majority of us thinks.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
