On 07/10/14 00:54, Andrew Rist wrote: > > On 10/4/2014 1:57 AM, jan i wrote: >> Thanks jürgen for the work you have done. >> >> making a mac bot a priority seems to be easier said than done. We have had >> a ticket open with infra for more than 2 years, and despite many pokes from >> arist and myself, there are still no date when we can have one > An update on this. (drum roll please...) We have received the mac > buildbot! > There are various people to thank for finally getting this done, David > Nalley (vp infra) figured out how to move it forward. > At this point, I've had it for a week, but been OOTO due to some > conference. > I expect to have it build up and ready to go in short order. >
sounds perfect, when you need help please let me know. Or when I can get access on the machine I can probably help with the setup as well. Juergen > A. >> >> We have the same problem with a number of our other platforms, and infra >> does not seems very busy with other issues than to care about our >> specialities. >> >> In other words, I strongly believe we have to depend on non-apache hardware >> to produce a major part of the binaries. A new release manager should >> provide or have access to several VMs in order to cut the release. It has >> always looked as if Jürgen had direct or indirect access to all the >> platforms needed. >> >> A release manager does not need to be PMC, but only the PMC have binding >> votes for a release......this can theoritically lead to a situation where >> the vote ends with only +1, but the release manager gives a non-binding -1. >> If nothing else that should lead to a funny board report. >> >> just my thoughts. >> rgds >> jan I >> >> Ps. it seems markmail does not support inline responses, or am I doing >> something wrong ? >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
