On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello, > >> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de] > >> Being a customer, I do see things differently. >> Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF. > > theoretically correct, but practically? > >> One day in future LO will save ODF as a secondary >> option. > > Possible. > > But where is the problem? Either OOXML *is* ISO standard or is not > ISO-standard. > > If the problem is however that MS is 'meddling' in the standard, then it is a > political issue that requires policy responses - not a question of software > development. > >> Finally MS wins > > There is no tomorrow (or "finally") for it - MS wins today. > > For example: > http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Berliner-Finanzaemter-wechseln-zurueck-auf-Microsoft-Office-2430961.html > >> MS comes up with the next shit > > life is not a pony farm and competition is not a throw with cotton balls. It > is about the competition and we have to face, and not whine. >
I believe a decision like the one in Berlin is always political motivated. See for example the upcoming discussion about the same topic in Munich after changes in the administration. Juergen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
