On 19/11/14 18:16, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 18/11/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> I simply forgot it and have this step not on my list. Maybe we can add >> it on https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_for_developers to be >> aware of this step in the future. > > This page (which I will call "A") has an "outdated" notice. It says that > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO (B) is the updated > version, and this one in turn says that > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO/new_proposal (C) is > better. > > Can we clarify this a bit? As things stand now (i.e., we use Pootle and > don't have the genLang workflow enabled) which of A, B and C describes > the current state of things and which one describes the latest ideas on > genLang?
I used mainly (A) and noticed the outdated as well :-( It's still on my to-do list to update the page according my notes and how I do it currently. This is of course independent of (C). I will also take a look on (B), I remember that this is an old page and we started to document our new collected knowledge on (A). Juergen > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
