> From: Bruce Byfield [mailto:bbyfi...@axion.net]
> I would suggest that the question goes beyond marketing. It is about > purpose as well. What makes AOO worth spending time on, as opposed to > any other similar project? It is the high quality and practical significance. OK, at the moment there are some problems, _but the intervention of Apache also shows that we are properly organized, we have a functioning quality management_. The update cycles are possibly a little too long, but not much. The right update cycle for commercial users, should be between 12-18 months are (necessary security updates in addition) > For that matter ask why people have NOT chosen AOO. Most people use AOO, LO is strong only on Linux. AOO to dominate under MS Windows, and there are >90% of all office users (AOO, LO, MS Office, etc.) > But why, for example, is AOO > almost totally > unrepresented in ODF Authors, For the German community, I can say that we edit the German-language documentation OO under the direction to the PrOOo box (www.prooo-box.org). 3 people working there permanently(!) at the german documentation, and currently employs a total of 5 people at the german documentation. You can see here our recent public email about documentation: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-users-de/201608.mbox/%3C005e01 d1fd3d%2481d13960%248573ac20%24%40wienandt.de%3E Note: the PrOOo box is formally a third-party-Project, but the workers there are also German community members of AOO. Jorg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
