+1

Great analysis and working things out: pats, arielch, marcus.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 06:00
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: {Dicuss] [Vote] Summary
> 
> This thread has morphed a bit, and I think a summary may be useful at
> this time.
> 
> It started with Keith pointing out, correctly, that I was taking a short
> cut by starting the vote before all the relevant bugs had been marked
> "Fixed", although after I was sure they were all fixed in reality. That
> aspect was quickly resolved by Ariel updating the bugs in question. All
> 4.1.3 release blocker bugs are now marked as fixed.
> 
> It then shifted into a discussion of what should be in the release
> notes. There are three classes of Bugzilla issues involved:
> 
> 1. Fixes affecting the behavior of binaries. Listing these in the
> release notes is non-controversial.
> 
> 2. Administrative changes, changing the release number in various
> places.
> 
> 3. Fixes to the build systems. Because of the year time lapse since
> 4.1.2, there was an accumulation of issues that affect building in
> various environments.
> 
> The question was how to handle the second and third classes. They are
> uninteresting, and in some cases incomprehensible, to the vast majority
> of AOO users. The plan is to only mention "interesting" bugs directly in
> the release notes, but include the URL for a Bugzilla query that shows
> all the fixes.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to