Go for which option? Or do you mean option 4 with the "Go" language?
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > Go for it! ;-) > > > Am 03.10.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Now what: > > 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences > > (GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us > to? > > 2. Drop Windows as a platform, since it's the only affected platform > (*nix > > users usually install distro OpenJDK packages so 32 bit OpenJDK will be > > available for 32 bit AOO). We have no Win64 AOO. > > 3. Drop 32 bit versions of AOO and add Win64 support. > > 4. Or drop Java entirely and port our Java code to eg. .NET core, which > is > > liberally licensed and private copies of it can be shipped? > > > > Damjan > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > > wrote: > > > >> Hello all, > >> > >> It seems that Oracle pulled the 32-bit version of Java 9: > >> > >> https://twitter.com/mreinhold/status/912311207935090689 > >> > >> Matthias > >> > >> > >> > > >
