On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Pedro Lino <pedro.l...@mailbox.org> wrote:
> Hi Andrea, all > > > Remember that the amount of code changes needed to produce something > > named 4.1.5 is quite significant and very much error-prone. Take a > look > > at the relevant issues in case, but for a "quick fix" I would > definitely > > stick to 4.1.4, produce 4.1.4-RC5 and vote on RC5, while undoing > what we > > did for 4.1.4-RC4. > > > > +1 > > > I have > > still to understand the importance of this bug too - I assume this > > affects potentially many users, otherwise we can go the slippery way > of > > "fix just another small bug" for ages. > > > > > This is not a fix for a small bug. It is a regression introduced since > 4.1.3 > > I believe all regressions from 4.1.3 should be fixed before release. After > all 4.1.4 is a bug fix release, so regressions are not expected (or > acceptable IMO) > > > Pedro > I agree with Pedro's assessment of regressions. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Only the truth will save you now." -- Ensei Tankado, "Digital Fortress"