a followup, see below... On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Kay Schenk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> > I've committed changes to the QA area complete with the "index" >> capability >> > of the new test case area. I'll be working on additional changes to the >> QA >> > area over the next few days before a general announcement to QA. >> > >> > NOTE: the staging web site -- http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/ -- >> allows >> > for +Indexes automatically so displays can be misleading in that >> > environment. Our default setup for -- http://www.openoffice.org/ -- >> does >> > not. >> > >> > We should probably request that infra setup both these servers the same. >> > >> > >> Kay; >> >> Just tried to check out ooo-site repo in preparation for completing the >> download of all the Impress test cases and ran into a problem. You have >> a number of files that include an * in the filename. This is no-no on >> windows and causes a corrupt working copy on Windows that can not be >> used. Can you update the ooo-site repo and replace those 1/2 dozen or so >> files with * in the names so that I can check out a new working copy? >> > > Yes, I will do that. > OK, I did a series of svn mv on the "bad" file names. My svn commands told me this -- some area// svn mv 350_Extend_Text_*_Cell_Properties_Numbers_Thousands_separator.html 350_Extend_Text_Cell_Properties_Numbers_Thousands_separator.html A 350_Extend_Text_Cell_Properties_Numbers_Thousands_separator.html D 350_Extend_Text_*_Cell_Properties_Numbers_Thousands_separator.html which should have deleted the old file and replaced/renamed it with the old file. However, when I did the commit, the old file names are STILL there in staging, so perhaps I need to do more to get things in sync. Later... > > >> >> Also a process question. Why did you chose to put all the tests in a >> single directory rather than breaking it down by application the way >> they were on the testlink site? > > > An oversight on my part, but as I got into this, I did see there was a > LOT of overlap, with the former QA folks establishing categories for some > very specific areas. We can probably restructure this new area just based > on file names and move things around. I discovered on the original TestLink > site that there were MANY fine-grained categorizations that we probably > don't need. > > > > >> The process engineer in me says that it >> would be cleaner to do it by application so that a volunteer working on >> Writer doesn't have to wade through tests that do not apply to them to >> find the Writer specific ones. >> > > I thought perhaps the file names themselves would suffice for determining > categories. In any case, please feel free to organize this area further. I > would think subareas for Wrtier, Calc, Impress, Database, Drawing would be > enough -- or not. > > > >> >> Regards >> Keith > > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "Less is MORE." > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Less is MORE."
