Hi Mechtilde,

Am 26.03.19 um 10:51 schrieb Stehmann:
> +1
> And thanks to Matthias for his work.

Without your work on the Pootle synchronization this wouldn't have been
possible. ;-)

Matthias

>
> Mechtilde 
>
> Am 26. März 2019 10:44:01 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel 
> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think it is time to move on and tag a Developer Snapshot (Dev1).
>> People need something "official" to test. Our buildbots do not produce
>> release quality (for various reasons) and we still miss macOS there.
>>
>> As soon as the Release Manager creates a tag I can begin to build for
>> Windows. (Remember, it takes about 15 hours for a complete build incl.
>> all languages, SDK and Language Packs). Revision 1856225 would be OK
>> for me.
>>
>> Dev1 will still contain many things to be fixed. But it can be a common
>> base to discuss about. And of course more Developer Builds are likely
>> to
>> follow until we reach the level for a (public) Beta.
>>
>> Does that sound like a way to go?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>    Matthias
>>
>>
>> Am 24.03.19 um 16:39 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 24.03.19 um 14:23 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>
>>>> On 24.03.19 13:41, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 24.03.19 um 13:37 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>>>> yes but we want to write a blog post on the Development Version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I would like to write what the user can expect of 4.2.0 what is
>> in
>>>>>> the scope, and what is not.
>>>>> Users should not expect anything, this is for developers.
>>>> We want to write a blog post for developers?
>>> We want to release a *developer build* right now and that is what we
>>> should announce (when it is ready):
>>> What it is intended for, what known bugs are still in it and need to
>> be
>>> fixed, how the translation process is proceeding.
>>> Call for testing, etc...
>>>
>>> This can be announced on dev@, dev-de@, l10n@ and the forum. Also
>> this
>>> should be linked on our homepage to give the average user an
>> impression
>>> about our latest development activities.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>    Matthias
>>>
>>> P.S.: Of course we can (and should) do much more blogposts in
>> general. ;-)
>>>>>> And then we need to describe how much bug fixes are in scope until
>> beta,
>>>>>> how many are optional.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We should the describe the beta state, which we want to make and
>> finish
>>>>>> with the release criteria.
>>>>> Beta has no state at the moment.
>>>> Sorry, was not good at expressing. I mean we should say which
>> conditions
>>>> have to be met in order to start into Beta Phase, and to whom it is
>>>> interesting.
>>>>>> That would make it for me worthwhile to give people a frame for
>> the
>>>>>> 4.2.0 development line and to write about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right? Or what do you believe we should write in the Blog post?
>>>>> I would be happy if we only had a page (in CWiki?) to work together
>> on
>>>>> the blogpost...
>>>>>
>>>>> Or did you want to do it all alone? ;-)
>>>> No I just think we have a total different idea what this blog post
>>>> should contain. Okay, I will reduce my writings to amore overview
>> level
>>>> and then post.
>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24.03.19 13:09, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 24.03.19 um 13:04 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>>>>>> yes I am on it. I found 106 closed issues. Does this sound
>> right, or
>>>>>>>> should there be more?
>>>>>>> I am not sure...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But I am more interested in the open issues. And who fixes them!
>> ;-)
>>>>>>> Remember, this is a developer build, not a Beta or even a
>> release...
>>>>>>>> On 24.03.19 12:47, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 24.03.19 um 12:41 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there an overview on the Languages we have now available
>> and which
>>>>>>>>>> have Issues?
>>>>>>>>> Mechtilde knows best.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But we should inform l10n@ about the languages where UI are not
>> at 100%
>>>>>>>>> in Dev1.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let's start on the blogpost! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All the Best
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 24.03.19 10:41, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Most of the translations for trunk and 42X are now updated.
>> Some are
>>>>>>>>>>> still missing due to technical problems but as translation is
>> a work in
>>>>>>>>>>> progress I think this will be sufficient for Dev1.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I also created an empty directory structure on our dist
>> server [1].
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>    Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev1/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 21.03.19 um 21:10 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, I will create a subspapge and Link it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.03.19 16:19, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about crating the draft somewhere here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Apache+OpenOffice+4.2.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 21.03.19 um 07:56 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets do this together, I write a first daraft on the
>> weekend. And then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can add stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20.03.19 12:42, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If no one will, I will....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2019, at 3:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.03.19 um 19:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that once we update the xlation files, we could
>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ready for a tag and build of Dev1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have volunteers to write a blog post? ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to