Hello Damjan, I applied the patch and build it under Debian 9. The DEBs I got, worked under Debian 11.
The detection of Java 8u222, Java 11.0.4 and Java 12.0.2 works. Java means OpnJDK which is shipped with Debian. The German builds I published under /home/mechtilde/public_html/NewBuild Thanks to Damjan. Mechtilde Am 18.08.19 um 12:00 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > The attached patch starts to get it working. It should detect Java >= 8u222 > but will wrongly label it "Oracle Corporation", as I haven't dug into the > main/jvmfwk/plugins/sunmajor/pluginlib/vendorbase.cxx file yet, which does > another vendor search. > > Please test it on Java 11 if you can, as the java.vendor property change > may be the problem there as well. After all, the patch to 8u222 was just a > backport from some future Java version, so it definitely isn't the only > version this patch fixes. > > I also wonder if the entire framework for detecting Java needs to be > rethought, given how much the Java ecosystem has changed since the Kaffe / > GCJ / GNU Classpath days. > > Regards > Damjan > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 11:29 AM Mechtilde <o...@mechtilde.de> wrote: > >> Hello Damjan, >> >> I figured it out under Debian >= 9 with Java 8u222. >> >> We need also a solution to detect java 11 which is used in Debian 10 >> (buster, stable) >> >> Am 18.08.19 um 10:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> Hi Damjan, >>> >>> Thank you for looking into it! >>> >>> Indeed it was Ubuntu 16.04 where I could replicate the problem with >>> OpenJDK8u222. >>> >>> Am 18.08.19 um 03:06 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: >>>> Before: >>>> java.vendor=Oracle Corporation >>>> >>>> After: >>>> java.vendor=Private Build >>>> >>>> This is apparently something Java now allows configuring when it's >> built: >>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221171 >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/rev/e0b7721459ee >>>> >>>> We probably need to relax the vendor checks, as we'll soon be flooded by >>>> different java.vendor properties on different platforms, as different >>>> package repositories begin setting their own... >>> >>> Definitely! >>> >>> I have this changelog for Ubuntu: >>> >>> >> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/435284148/openjdk-8_8u212-b03-0ubuntu1.19.04.2_8u222-b10-1ubuntu1~19.04.1.diff.gz >>> >>> Searching for --with-vendor-name gives several results. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:39 AM Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Found 8u222 on Ubuntu 16.04, testing... >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:32 AM Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 8.202.8 and 8.212.4.1 work for me on FreeBSD. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me see if I can find 8u222 somewhere. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 6:23 PM Matthias Seidel < >>>>>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If nobody can confirm this it must be an error on every installation >>>>>>> that I run... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Otherwise it would be a release blocker for 4.1.7! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 14.08.19 um 16:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>>>> Hi Damjan, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 14.08.19 um 07:02 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: >>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What does "java --version" give? >>>>>>>> openjdk version "1.8.0_222" >>>>>>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build >>>>>>> 1.8.0_222-8u222-b10-1ubuntu1~16.04.1-b10) >>>>>>>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.222-b10, mixed mode) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You might need to backport the following commit to 4.1.x: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> commit 3bd2d6aed629c4323ea9e8426acfb793eb9046fd >>>>>>>>> Author: Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> Date: Sun Apr 15 15:00:46 2018 +0000 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Allow the Java version suffix (eg. the 162 in 1.8.0_162) to be >>>>>>>>> 3 digits long. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Patch by: me >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> git-svn-id: >>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk@1829211 >>>>>>>>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >>>>>>>> Just to clarify: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This also happens with AOO 4.2.0 (I installed Jims last build from >> July >>>>>>>> on Xubuntu). >>>>>>>> I really think that there was a change in the Java update 8u222. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:19 PM Matthias Seidel < >>>>>>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Today I noticed that on my Ubuntu machine OpenJDK 8u222 isn't >> listed >>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> AOO (4.1.6) anymore. >>>>>>>>>> But everything works, it seems to be detected and to be used, >> that is >>>>>>>>>> why I didn't notice it earlier. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I do remember that I got the update from Java 8u212 to Java 8u222 >>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>>> time ago. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In my test VM with Ubuntu (32-bit) which has still Java 8u212 >>>>>>> installed >>>>>>>>>> it is visible in AOO. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can anyone confirm this? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Mechtilde Stehmann >> ## Apache OpenOffice >> ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows >> ## Debian Developer >> ## PGP encryption welcome >> ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Apache OpenOffice ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
