I'm confused... from what I can see this just affected trunk. So how is it 
breaking AOO42X? Did you apply the patch to your local copy?

> On Oct 3, 2019, at 6:28 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Don,
> 
> Am 03.10.19 um 07:01 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On  2 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On  2 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>> Windows build (42X) breaks:
>>>> 
>>>> =============
>>>> Building module expat
>>>> =============
>>>> 
>>>> Entering /cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/main/expat
>>>> 
>>>> mkdir: cannot create directory
>>>> './wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/expat-2.2.9/lib': File exists
>>>> Making: ../../../../../wntmsci12.pro/slo/x64/xmltok.obj
>>>> mkdir: cannot create directory '../../../../../wntmsci12.pro/slo/x64/':
>>>> File exists
>>>> xmltok.c
>>>> dmake:  Error: -- `../../../../../wntmsci12.pro/slo/x64/loadlibrary.obj'
>>>> not found, and can't be made
>>>> dmake:  Error code 255, while making
>>>> './wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/so_built_so_expat'
>>>> 
>>>> 1 module(s):
>>>>         expat
>>>> need(s) to be rebuilt
>>>> 
>>>> Reason(s):
>>>> 
>>>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
>>>> /cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/main/expat
>>>> 
>>>> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
>>>> by running:
>>>> 
>>>>         build --from expat
>>> Try this patch:
>> [ deleted, the patch was malformed and would not apply ]
> 
> Ah, that was the reason why I couldn't get it applied... ;-)
> 
> Anyway, it was time for bed (for me).
> 
>> 
>> I've committed what I think should be a fix.  I can't verify that
>> because I don't have a 64-bit windows machine.  I was able to verfy
>> that the 32-bit Windows build still works.
> 
> I started a new build now...
> 
> Matthias
> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org>

Reply via email to