On 5/17/2020 5:56 AM, Marcus wrote: > Am 12.05.20 um 03:47 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> As promised here is a draft for a high level blog post. It is rough so >> please feel free to edit to your hearts content or to make any >> suggestions. >> >> Would you like to help with the development of the leading open source >> office suite? This is your chance. Apache® OpenOffice® needs people to >> help in the development process. You do not need to be a software >> engineer or programmer though those skills are always needed. The >> project needs people who will install the software and to test it for >> quality, reliability, and submit bug reports, write documentation, and >> other tasks as well. If this sounds like something that you would be >> interested in than join with many others from all over the world on our >> development mailing list by sending an e-mail to >> mailto:dev-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org and join the fun. > > thanks a lot for the text. I've changed it a bit and now asking for > feedback. When there are no bigger changes I would like to post it today > late evening on our blog. > > Do we want to point the people to the new dev release or not? I'm not > sure what the lastest status is. > > > > The Apache® OpenOffice® Projekt is on the road to a bigger update for > its leading open source office suite. > > This is your chance. OpenOffice needs people to help in the development > process. Don't panic, you do not need to be a software engineer or > programmer though those skills are always needed. It's enough when you > just install the software and test it for quality, reliability, language > translations and submit bug reports, write documentation, and many other > tasks as well. > > If this sounds like something that you would be interested in than join > with many others from all over the world on our development mailing list > by sending an e-mail to dev@ > <mailto:dev-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org> and join the fun. > > > > Thanks > > Marcus
Marcus; The changes look good except that its should be either it is or it's it would probably be better to use it is rather than the contraction it's. The only other as mentioned is Project rather than projekt. As far as pointing people to the dev release there is a thread on private@ discussing that. As far as it being in the blog post, no that would be a problem. Regards Keith
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
