Playing devil's advocate here: does it make sense to actually post a blog article about this and then, maybe a week later, have the article moot with the actual release?
Maybe it is better to address the issue with the release announcement...? > On Dec 27, 2020, at 1:26 PM, Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi - > > I made extensive edits for consistency and language. > > Patricia, please take a look if you wish. > > Regards, > Dave > >> On Dec 27, 2020, at 9:20 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> wrote: >> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] >>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM >>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: >>> [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur) >>> >>> Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so that it can be >>> edited. We cannot promise a release by the end of the year. >>> We should not imply that macOS Big Sur is the only reason for >>> 4.1.9. All platforms will benefit. >>> >>> Thanks for your efforts. >>> >>> +1 once the text is properly edited. >> >> see: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=173080814 >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
