On 17.08.2021 17:37, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 17.08.2021 16:10, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 17.08.21 um 15:55 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher (Apache):
>>> On 16.08.2021 10:20, Bidouille wrote:
>>>> Hello team,
>>>>
>>>> Since july, AdoptOpenJDK has been renamed Adoptium JDK.
>>>> This project don't provide any JRE for Windows x86.
>>>> https://adoptium.net/releases.html
>>>>
>>>> So this will be a problem if AOO port x64 is not completed:
>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=46594
>>> You may want to try
>>> <https://www.azul.com/downloads/?os=windows&architecture=x86-32-bit&package=jdk-fx>
>>> which also
>>> includes JavaFX (which AdoptOpenJDK seems to ignore). (There are quite a
>>> few Java OpenJDK sites
>>> which all use the same sources, depending on the site 32-bit Java versions
>>> may be available or not.)
>> See:
>>
>> https://adoptopenjdk.net/faq.html#openjfxfaq
> Yes, I know that statement, however it is not true, there are backports of
> OpenJFX bug fixes exactly
> for that reason (also, OpenJFX has been using OpenJDK 11 as its baseline).
> That is also the reason
> why others do support the "FX" and/or "FULL" versions. Not sure why they
> state that, maybe no one
> re-checked or there are no resources for JFX available (which is actually not
> necessary as one just
> has to add the four FX modules to a distribution and voilà they are
> contained).
>
> ---rony
As an example, here one of the latest OpenJFX backport to OpenJDK 11:
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [jfx11u] RFR: Request to backport July 2021 CPU changes
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:20:20 +0200
From: Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com>
To: Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>
CC: openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net <openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net>
Approved.
- Johan
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 6:01 PM Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>
wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> I request approval to backport the changes from the just-released July
> 2021 CPU to jfx11u (for 11.0.12) .
>
>
https://github.com/kevinrushforth/jfx11u/compare/db9b1b7440...cpu-2107-sync
>
> This is a straight backport (patch applies cleanly) of the one FX fix
> that went into the July CPU.
>
> NOTE: Since this is an integration of already-reviewed fixes, I will
> push it directly to the master branch of the jfx11u repo rather than via
> a pull request.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Kevin
>
or
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Request to backport 7 fixes to 11-dev for 11.0.11
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 13:53:11 +0100
From: Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com>
To: openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net List <openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net>
Hi Kevin,
I request permission to backport the following issues to 11-dev, for the
11.0.11 release:
JDK-8258592: Control labels in Dialogs are truncated at certain DPI scaling
levels
JDK-8256283: IndexOutOfBoundsException when sorting a TreeTableView
JDK-8165749: java.lang.RuntimeException: dndGesture.dragboard is null in
drag
JDK-8249737: java.lang.RuntimeException: Too many touch points reported
JDK-8252099: JavaFX does not render Myanmar script correctly
JDK-8261460: Incorrect CSS applied to ContextMenu on DialogPane
JDK-8248126: JavaFX ignores HiDPI scaling settings on some linux platforms
- Johan
---rony
