Hi all, Adoptium Java 8 Update 302 (x86) is showing up:
https://adoptium.net/releases.html?variant=openjdk8&jvmVariant=hotspot Regards, Matthias Am 17.08.21 um 17:59 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Rony, > > Am 17.08.21 um 17:51 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher (Apache): >> On 17.08.2021 17:37, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: >>> Hi Matthias, >>> >>> On 17.08.2021 16:10, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>> Am 17.08.21 um 15:55 schrieb Rony G. Flatscher (Apache): >>>>> On 16.08.2021 10:20, Bidouille wrote: >>>>>> Hello team, >>>>>> >>>>>> Since july, AdoptOpenJDK has been renamed Adoptium JDK. >>>>>> This project don't provide any JRE for Windows x86. >>>>>> https://adoptium.net/releases.html >>>>>> >>>>>> So this will be a problem if AOO port x64 is not completed: >>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=46594 >>>>> You may want to try >>>>> <https://www.azul.com/downloads/?os=windows&architecture=x86-32-bit&package=jdk-fx> >>>>> which also >>>>> includes JavaFX (which AdoptOpenJDK seems to ignore). (There are quite a >>>>> few Java OpenJDK sites >>>>> which all use the same sources, depending on the site 32-bit Java >>>>> versions may be available or not.) >>>> See: >>>> >>>> https://adoptopenjdk.net/faq.html#openjfxfaq >>> Yes, I know that statement, however it is not true, there are backports of >>> OpenJFX bug fixes exactly >>> for that reason (also, OpenJFX has been using OpenJDK 11 as its baseline). >>> That is also the reason >>> why others do support the "FX" and/or "FULL" versions. Not sure why they >>> state that, maybe no one >>> re-checked or there are no resources for JFX available (which is actually >>> not necessary as one just >>> has to add the four FX modules to a distribution and voilà they are >>> contained). >>> >>> ---rony >> As an example, here one of the latest OpenJFX backport to OpenJDK 11: > I am not that deep into Java, I only use AdoptOpenJDK to compile AOO. ;-) > > What JRE the user installs is up to him/her... > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [jfx11u] RFR: Request to backport July 2021 CPU changes >> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:20:20 +0200 >> From: Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> >> To: Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> >> CC: openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net <openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net> >> >> >> Approved. >> >> - Johan >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 6:01 PM Kevin Rushforth >> <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Johan, >> > >> > I request approval to backport the changes from the just-released July >> > 2021 CPU to jfx11u (for 11.0.12) . >> > >> > >> https://github.com/kevinrushforth/jfx11u/compare/db9b1b7440...cpu-2107-sync >> > >> > This is a straight backport (patch applies cleanly) of the one FX fix >> > that went into the July CPU. >> > >> > NOTE: Since this is an integration of already-reviewed fixes, I will >> > push it directly to the master branch of the jfx11u repo rather than >> via >> > a pull request. >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > -- Kevin >> > >> >> or >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> >> Subject: Request to backport 7 fixes to 11-dev for 11.0.11 >> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 13:53:11 +0100 >> From: Johan Vos <johan....@gluonhq.com> >> To: openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net List <openjfx-...@openjdk.java.net> >> >> >> >> Hi Kevin, >> >> I request permission to backport the following issues to 11-dev, for the >> 11.0.11 release: >> >> JDK-8258592: Control labels in Dialogs are truncated at certain DPI >> scaling >> levels >> >> JDK-8256283: IndexOutOfBoundsException when sorting a TreeTableView >> >> JDK-8165749: java.lang.RuntimeException: dndGesture.dragboard is null in >> drag >> >> JDK-8249737: java.lang.RuntimeException: Too many touch points reported >> >> JDK-8252099: JavaFX does not render Myanmar script correctly >> >> JDK-8261460: Incorrect CSS applied to ContextMenu on DialogPane >> >> JDK-8248126: JavaFX ignores HiDPI scaling settings on some linux >> platforms >> >> - Johan >> >> ---rony >> >> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
