Hi Arrigo, Am 13.02.22 um 18:43 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello Matthias, > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 05:43:25PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Arrigo, >> >> Am 13.02.22 um 17:22 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >>> Hello Matthias, All, >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:15:32PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Arrigo, >>>> >>>> Same here: Would this also be wanted in trunk and AOO42X? >>> I think so. This commit had to be adjusted because AOO42X and trunk do >>> not seem to support Java 1.7, whereas AOO41X did. >>> >>> I merged the other one about the `tmp' folder. >>> >>> Thank you for pointing this out! My bad; I should not work on trunk >>> directly... >> No problem, I just want to have the branches in sync as much as possible. > Sure! > > [...] > >> The fix for "Azul" is just for building? >> >> I ask, because on Windows the Azul JDK is already detected. But it is >> listed as "OpenJDK" like the one from Adoptium. Maybe we can make that >> list a bit more clear? > The commit changes the logic that selects whether "mac.java.path" > shall be set to "mac.oracle.java.path" or "mac.apple.java.path". > > Apparently, there are two ``families'' of JDK's under macOS, and each > family keeps its base classes in a different path. > > This edit only affects building under macOS. > > Do you suggest that an explanation like the above shall be integrated > into the file as a comment?
No, I just noticed that JDKs based on OpenJDK are all listed as "OpenJDK" in the AOO settings. Hard to distinguish. But that is a minor issue... Regards, Matthias > > Best regards,
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
