Hi All, Now that AOO 4.1.14 is released wouldn't it be the perfect time to start development on an AppImage (or similar)?
Regards, Matthias Am 18.02.23 um 13:48 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi, > > Am 15.02.23 um 18:05 schrieb Yury Tarasievich: >> On 15/02/2023 19:39, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >>> I documented 8 projects that tried to achieve that and compared them >>> in the attached spreadsheet, and there are more. >> The document is a beaut, but you've excluded Flatpak and Snap, one of >> which you sort of condemn and one of which you recommend, nevertheless. >> >> Why not AppImage, for which half a work is already there, AFAIU ? (I >> mean `installed` method of packaging) So it hasn't got sandboxing. Is >> it such a big deal? > I don't think we need sandboxing in the first place. > > An easy to install package for Linux would be good, so maybe we can try > to do an Appimage package after the release of AOO 4.1.14? > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> Also, any new packaging method would have to integrate into the >> existing build framework? Which isn't exactly a model of clarity and >> robustness? >> >> -Yury >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature