Hi All, Any news on this topic?
If we want it to happen we need to work on it... Regards, Matthias Am 21.03.23 um 16:19 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi All, > > Now that AOO 4.1.14 is released wouldn't it be the perfect time to start > development on an AppImage (or similar)? > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 18.02.23 um 13:48 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi, >> >> Am 15.02.23 um 18:05 schrieb Yury Tarasievich: >>> On 15/02/2023 19:39, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> >>>> I documented 8 projects that tried to achieve that and compared them >>>> in the attached spreadsheet, and there are more. >>> The document is a beaut, but you've excluded Flatpak and Snap, one of >>> which you sort of condemn and one of which you recommend, nevertheless. >>> >>> Why not AppImage, for which half a work is already there, AFAIU ? (I >>> mean `installed` method of packaging) So it hasn't got sandboxing. Is >>> it such a big deal? >> I don't think we need sandboxing in the first place. >> >> An easy to install package for Linux would be good, so maybe we can try >> to do an Appimage package after the release of AOO 4.1.14? >> >> Regards, >> >> Matthias >> >>> Also, any new packaging method would have to integrate into the >>> existing build framework? Which isn't exactly a model of clarity and >>> robustness? >>> >>> -Yury >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
