On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 7:10 PM Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 16.01.24 um 17:50 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > I've now pushed my "odf-1.3" branch upstream, which has some initial ODF > > 1.3 compatibility patches, a patch adding a new constraint for the > RECEIVED > > function, and another to only make the upgrade dialog appear when > version > > > 1.3. > > > > There are 3 useful parts to the ODF 1.3 specification, part 2 dealing > with > > packaging, part 3 with the OpenDocument schema, and part 4 with > > OpenFormula. So far I've mostly been developing part 4. Of the 34 issues > > under part 4, 20 are now complete, which means part 4 development is > > already 59% complete. > > from zero to 59% in a few days. That's great.! :-) > :-) > > Would anyone like to help? > > If you mean coding, then you have to teach me C++ first. ;-P > Honestly, here I won't be of any help. Other things depend. > For my latest change, which added support for weekday types 11-17 to the WEEKDAY function, those new types should probably be documented in the "OpenOffice Help" page for WEEKDAY. Can someone update those? > > Before we bring this into a release, we should discuss and define how we > want or should offer the ODF 1.3 support. > > My suggestion: > > Instead of putting this as a selectable option in the Save dialog, we > should add this to the other ODF version parts (see menu "Tools - > Options - Load/Save - General - Default file format and ODF settings"). > Yes, I still need to add that. > I don't know how loading is working. But I would expect that the header > data is read and the ODF version is recognized with some magic numbers. > If you unzip an OpenDocument file, there are office:version="1.3" attributes on at least content.xml, meta.xml, settings.xml, and styles.xml. Damjan
