Hi Jürgen, Le Vendredi 17 Novembre 2006 10:19, Juergen Schmidt a écrit : > > UNO is powerful, portable, and at the core of OpenOffice.org, but it has > > the disadvantage of not being used outside of OOo. > > not true, there is a bigger company (can't be named here and in fact of > this not popular) which have chosen UNO as their component model and > they have built their own infrastructure on top of the UNO Runtime > Environment (URE). They have chosen UNO because of the best performance, > best feature set, ... and the selection was based on an in-depth > evaluation of different technologies ;-)
Yes, as I said above, UNO is powerful... But that example shows that it is far away from what I would call "spreading", "popular" or "widely accepted". > > What are the plans to make OOo scriptable through d-bus? > > no plans so far OK. My own order of priorities prevents me from working on this d-bus stuff in short or medium term. Nevertheless, we have here an opportunity for an unified application scripting framework, at least on Unix/Linux systems, my opinion is that we at OpenOffice.org should take it. -- Quelle est la différence entre un rêveur, un fou et un psychanalyste ? Le rêveur construit des châteaux dans le ciel, le fou y habite, le psychanalyste encaisse les loyers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
