Hi, Caolan McNamara wrote: > a) Identifiers > > In DEV300_m14 we have... > > a) com.sun.reportdesigner for the report designer > b) <none> so becomes > org.openoffice.legacy.sun-presentation-minimizer.oxt for the > presentation minimizer
This is changed in cws pppopt05. (It now contains the arch-identifier, too) > c) com.sun.wiki-publisher for the wiki publisher but then > d) com.sun.PresenterScreen-linux_x86 for the Presenter Screen a) and c) don't need the arch prefix anyway (Java, and thus arch-indep *cough*) And you missed: e) com.sun.star.PDFImport-<...> > They all stay the same regardless of the platform except > for com.sun.PresenterScreen-*, so what was the outcome of the last time > this was discussed, should com.sun.PresenterScreen-linux_x86 just be > com.sun.PresenterScreen (my preference) or should the other arch Mine too, but I think we "lost" here... > dependent extensions get mangled identifier names to encode the arch > into them as well ? As said, pppopt05 has a arch-suffix for the minimizer, too (which is the left-over arch-dep extension in your list) > b) Shared installs > r > In DEV300_m14 the wiki publisher (alone of the extensions) cannot be > installed --shared. Is this just an oversight (see > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90055 for patch in that > case) or deliberate ?? I don't think we need to show the LGPL *AT ALL*. Neither to the user nor to the admin. OOo is LGPL and the user already uses OOo... > c) Checking out OpenOffice.org > > What is now the canonical way to check out OpenOffice.org ? is it meant > to be with alias OpenOffice3 ? > > i.e. > we have the alias Extensions3 for > "scext sdext swext tomcat apache-commons reportdesign jfreereport" > we have the alias OpenOffice3 which has ... > "sccomp, sdext, reportdesign, reportdesign" in it > > > So swext and friends do not appear in the OpenOffice3 (or OpenOffice2) > alias, so they don't get checked out, but they are referenced in the > build.lsts. So in practice is seems to be to check out *both* > OpenOffice3 and Extensions3 to get the full tree required to build Yes, that should be fixed... Not that I think the Extensions thong makes at all, given that you need the OOo tree to build those extensions anyway... Regards, Rene --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
