On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:50 PM, tora - Takamichi Akiyama < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ERROR: File not found: ScriptFramework.jar > > To find the module from which a missing file should come, > > 1. Build OpenOffice.org completely. What do you mean by " Build OpenOffice.org completely".? All the commands I've typed are ./configure and dmake. Now dmake has failed. > 2. Look for a name of the missing file from log files. > > e.g. > grep ScriptFramework.jar $SOLARVER/$INPATH/inc/*/deliver.log > > In my case, the commend above prints: > /xxxxx/solver/300/unxsoli4.pro/inc/scripting/deliver.log:COPY scripting/ > unxsoli4.pro/class/ScriptFramework.jar > unxsoli4.pro/bin/ScriptFramework.jar ScriptFramework.jar was not found in deliver log. [EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ pwd /home/vuhung/public_html/foss/src/DEV300_m29/solver/300/ unxlngi6.pro/inc/scripting [EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ grep ScriptFramework.jar * [EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ LANG=en_US grep ScriptFramework.jar */* grep: */*: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ ls build.lst deliver.log storage/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ ls storage/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] scripting]$ So, in your case, building a module 'scripting' failed and/or > 'deliver' command has not been executed in the module yet, > or the module has not been built at all. > What should I do now? > gcc version 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42) >> > > I don't know whether gcc 4.1.2 works fine for building current OOo. What is the recommended version of gcc as well as other prerequisite libraries? And I will try to build with latest gcc 4.3.1. Btw, the problem I am facing now has nothing to do with gcc version. I am on another thread with Caolan and he says that (older) OOo can be built with gcc 4.1.2 , but the binary will crash. > >> export CC="ccache gcc" >> export CXX="ccache g++" >> > > I don't know whether ccache works fine for building current OOo. It is recommended by OOo team :). For faster build time. > > The command 'dmake' works depending on its own dependency files. In my first try, cd DEV300_m29; dmake cannot be found, so I specify its full path. Ignore it. > > export CXXFLAGS="-Werror" >> export CFLAGS="-Werror -fvisibility=hidden" >> >> ./configure --prefix=$HOME \ >> --disable-cups \ >> --disable-pam \ >> --with-jdk-home=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0_07/ \ >> --disable-mozilla \ >> --disable-qadevooo \ >> --without-system-stdlibs \ >> --disable-odk \ >> --with-use-shell=bash \ >> --with-vendor="Vietnamese Localization Build" \ >> --disable-vba \ >> --with-use-shell=bash \ >> --with-ant-home=/usr/local/ant/ \ >> --without-java \ >> > > Looks too complicated. I cannot make any comments on that... I just tried to disable anything I don't need. --with-jdk-home=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0_07 and --without-java seems to be abnormal but I hope it is fine(?). Question: Why with --without-java, dmake still looks for a .jar file? > > source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh <http://linuxx86env.set.sh/> >> export SOLENV=`pwd`/solenv/ >> ./solenv/unxlngi6/bin/dmake >> > > Why do you need to explicitly specify the path to dmake instead of > simply type dmake? A PATH environment variable should be set properly > by LinuxX86Env.Set.sh and should help your command shell find dmake. > > Try type the following to check your environment: > > which dmake See above, I've checked and "which dmake" *IS* ./solenv/unxlngi6/bin/dmake. Sorry for the confusion. If your command shell answers another dmake, something goes wrongly. > > Additionally, in the next time, try to log everything: > > e.g. > dmake 2>&1 | tee dmake_`date +%Y%m%d_%H%M`.log > > And then look for outputs beginning with a line "Building project > scripting" > in the log file. I didn't find that string. However "Building module scripting" is found and it is nothing unusual. Full dmake log: http://aoclife.ddo.jp/~vuhung/foss/src/DEV300_m29/dmake_20080822_0013.log One more question: My configure output contains a warning: checking for xrandr >= 1.2... checking X11/extensions/Xrandr.h usability... no checking X11/extensions/Xrandr.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: X11/extensions/Xrandr.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence Is that safe to ignore? -- Best Regards, Nguyen Hung Vu ( Nguyễn Vũ Hưng ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16dg Japan through an eye of a gaijin: http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/tags/fav/
