Hi Ause, > in the current scenario, there is only one active patch per source > tarball which has to contain all required changes for the build. as > discussed in issue 40246, this may lead to duplication and hard to > maintain patches. > > with the changes done in the cws ause099, each change now will reside in > its own patch. for the local module makefiles, the only visible change > is PATCH_FILE_NAME -> PATCH_FILES. this variable now hold the list (and > apply prder) of the existing patches.
That's great news indeed, it will make patch maintenance (and more importantly getting rid of patches) much easier. Thanks! Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer frank.schoenh...@sun.com - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Base http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
