Hi,

On 23.1.2009, at 16:10, Hans-Joachim Lankenau wrote:

with the changes done in the cws ause099, each change now will reside in its own patch. for the local module makefiles, the only visible change is PATCH_FILE_NAME -> PATCH_FILES. this variable now hold the list (and
apply prder) of the existing patches.

brilliant news! Thanks for it.

Do we need to define some naming scheme for patches or should we keep the work of generating correct/random names to patchers?
--
Pavel Janík



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to